[Vol. 17
Book Reviews
International Maritime Law by PLINIO MANCA, Published by European
$18.00 per Volume.
Transport Law, Antwerp, Belgium 1970-1971, 3 Volumes –
Essays in the domain of maritime law, both as concerns interna-
tional law and national regulations, are undoubtedly numerous but
the work by Plinio Manca deserves a special place among them
for its great merit of offering a complete picture of the international
laws applicable to this specialized field. It is indeed the first time
that a task of this kind has been undertaken by an Italian scholar
and for those cognizant of the difficulties connected with the subject,
the goal was no easy one. A critical approach was needed together
with a capacity for analysis and synthesis in order to extract from
each text of law the essence of the law itself which constitutes
the philosophy of the subject. Plinio Manca, a well known authority
as well as an eminent lawyer and Professor at the Genoa University,
has undertaken the task and conducted the work in a masterly
fashion as the books themselves amply demonstrate.
The first volume discusses the institutional and legal framework
of all the situations centering in the ship. Attention is consequently
devoted to conventions on territorial waters, ships and shipowners,
shipping agents and finally work contracts with the crew. Several
of these topics have not been dealt with in international conventions;
they are nevertheless treated here together with the other subjects
with great command and profound knowledge.
– Volume two deals with contracts for the employment of ships
(hire, affreightment), the carriage of passengers and goods and
lastly international combined transport. The latter subject is still
under discussion at an international level after the attempt made
to bring in the air transport industry which had not previously
participated in the discussions.
The third volume is devoted to contribution to general average,
collisions, damages and interest in collision cases, rules to avoid
collisions, assistance and salvage, marine insurance, Lloyds, P. & I.
Clubs, mortgages and liens; the last part of the volume regards
the foreign arbitration, on the basis of the Geneva Convention of
1923 and 1927 and the New York Convention of 1958.
The analysis is by no means confined to internationally recog-
nized conventions but covers also projects of conventions and other
No. 3]
BOOK REVIEWS
unsettled matters where the author’s contribution is indeed sub-
stantial and invaluable.
The work is moreover well documented containing useful cross
references to all the subjects discussed. Particularly valuable is the
reference to the minutes of the international conferences of the
Comit6 Maritime International and the Brussels Diplomatic Con-
ferences which the author attended and where recognition was
given to his outstanding merits.
Lawyers, scholars and alla persons connected with international
maritime transportation will be grateful to Professor Plinio Manca
for his important contribution to the unification of maritime law
and related subjects. All will find these books most helpful, written
as they are by a master in his chosen field.
Giuseppe GurRRE
*
* LL.M., with the firm of Guerreri-Dagna is Rome, Italy.
McGILL LAW JOURNAL
[Vol. 17
Digest of Cases and Materials on the Divorce Act, 1968 by JULIEN D.
PAYNE, Vol. I, pp. xxxiii, 215 (March 1970); Supplement I, pp. xl, 214 (October
1970). The author, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
$30.00.
The author, professor of Family Law in the Faculty of Law at
the University of Alberta and already remarkable for the volume
of his doctrinal comment on divorce and family law matters in
general, has endeavoured to meet an evident need created by the
1968 reform of the law on divorce. The broadening of the grounds
for divorce and the fact that it is now a form of matrimonial relief
available throughout Canada has inevitably brought about the pub-
lication of a mass of judicial decisions on the subject. The need
for a digest of this material is clear and no justification is therefore
required for the appearance of this publication.
Something in the neighbourhood of 900 decisions have been
digested within these two small volumes (6 / x 8″) totalling no
more than 430 pages. They have been principally drawn, of course,
from Canadian courts (including decisions from Quebec, rendered
in English translation). But English decisions, as well as those
from other parts of the English-speaking common law world, are
also included. Professor Payne is to be commended for having
included further a sizeable number of unreported Canadian cases.
If these have been reported subsequently to the publication of the
principal volume of the Digest, the appropriate indication is given
in a table in Supplement I; if they have remained unreported,
interested persons may nonetheless obtain copies by writing to
the appropriate official. The Digest also contains the usual table
of cases, a “selected bibliography” and a reproduction of the text
of the Divorce Act itself at p. 203 of the first volume.
The success of a digest of judicial decisions can be measured
in a number of ways. When a digest on a specialized subject is the
first to appear on the market, and it thereby fills an obvious gap
in the working tools available, its author is very likely to be thanked
by students of the subject. Professor Payne has produced his work
with a speed that is commendable; and he promises a further
supplement at the end of 1971 which will enhance still further its
usefulness. But the real value of a digest must ultimately be judged
according to another criterion –
by the degree to which the user
can fully rely upon it as a working tool. In other words, its scope
and exactitude must be such that the user has complete confidence
in it. He must have the assurance that he can in fact find all the
No. 3]
BOOK REVIEWS
materials relevant to his problem within the publication and that
the digestion of the materials included is accurate.
On the first matter, that of the scope of the Digest, it would
have been preferable, in this reviewer’s opinion, to have specified,
as a matter of sound editorial policy, the aims of the Digest. There
is no indication from what series of reports and during what period
of publication of such reports the author has drawn his material.
Even an alphabetical table of the modes of citation of the reports
digested would have lessened the uncertainty somewhat. Is it to be
assumed that every Canadian case (of some, any, or only marginal
importance) has been included ? Exactly what period of time does
the Digest cover ? If decisions ante-dating our new federal legis-
lation and relating to ancillary provincial legislation have been
included, on what basis have they been selected ? And further:
while decisions of non-Canadian courts may very properly, in the
common law tradition, be included in a Digest primarily devoted
to Canadian law (for the reason, presumably, that an English or
New Zealand court has had an opportunity to grapple with a prob-
lem provoked by similar legislative expression), it would be helpful
to know on what basis they have been included. Is the rationale
that such decisions have been cited or approved by Canadian courts ?
Are these non-Canadian decisions drawn from the reports of cases
of countries X, Y or Z because our Canadian legislation was in part
modeled upon the laws of such countries ? These are not idle
questions. If the user doesn’t know the scope of the materials from
which the selection of decisions has been made, he cannot use the
Digest in complete security. Undeclared or subjective choices regard-
ing the inclusion or exclusion of material must surely be eschewed
by the author of a scientific tool; he has, at least, the obligation to
specify the ground rules, so to speak, that he has adopted in making
his compilation.
The other equally important feature of a digest, according to
which its real value may _be tested, is- only evident through an
extended use of it over some period of time. Exactitude and com-
pleteness in the scheme of subject headings, and the digestion and
classification of materials within those headings, are of obviously
cardinal importance. The author has chosen to follow, and it is a
convenient and logical choice, the breakdown and order of headings
as they are treated within the Divorce Act, 1968 itself, expanding
the sub-headings where necessary in Supplement I to include new
aspects of the subjects dealt with earlier in the first volume. The
entries themselves are composed either of direct quotations from
McGILL LAW JOURNAL
[Vol. 17
the judges’ notes or summaries by way of original digestion and,
so far as this reviewer can ascertain, are wholly accurate.
It has been indicated that at least one further volume of the
Digest will be forthcoming at the end of 1971. It is to be hoped that
the series will not stop there and that, with the likely future increase
in the volume of reported cases, an effort will be made to consolidate
these first three volumes while at the same time issuing further
supplements. If this does come to pass, then publication in a dif-
fererit format is much to be desired: a working tool the style of
binding of which prevents it from lying open flat on the work
table is a source of not a little annoyance. A looseleaf format
whereby up-dating pages could be replaced at specified intervals
would seem to be indicated. It is also to be hoped that, upon such
a re-issue of the work, the occasion might be seized to improve the
style of the page lay-out. A greater sophistication in the use of
various type sizes, with marginal or head-of-the-page indications
as to be subject matter treated, will facilitate its use as a reference
tool. But these are matters of style of production and secondary
in importance to the need for a specification of the editorial policy
adopted.
3. E. C. BRIERLEY
Faculty of Law
McGill University
