{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"McGill Law Journal","provider_url":"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/","author_name":"eftelpe.xistris@mail.mcgill.ca","author_url":"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/author\/eftelpe-xistrismail-mcgill-ca\/","title":"Regards crois\u00e9s entre le droit innu et le droit qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois : territorialit\u00e9s en conflit - McGill Law Journal","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MegbQfkghm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/article\/20353\/\">Regards crois\u00e9s entre le droit innu et le  droit qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois : territorialit\u00e9s en conflit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/article\/20353\/embed\/#?secret=MegbQfkghm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Regards crois\u00e9s entre le droit innu et le  droit qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois : territorialit\u00e9s en conflit\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; McGill Law Journal\" data-secret=\"MegbQfkghm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Introduction Au Qu\u00e9bec comme dans le reste du Canada, la construction et l\u2019\u00e9volution du droit \u00e9tatique se sont faites selon un certain nombre de th\u00e9ories imp\u00e9riales, historiquement peu nombreuses, reposant essentiellement sur le concept de \u00ab\u00a0r\u00e9ception\u00a0\u00bb. Au fondement de cette approche se trouve une fiction importante, laquelle a aliment\u00e9 l\u2019ignorance et l\u2019invisibilit\u00e9 des ordres juridiques &hellip; Continued"}