{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"McGill Law Journal","provider_url":"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/","author_name":"eftelpe.xistris@mail.mcgill.ca","author_url":"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/author\/eftelpe-xistrismail-mcgill-ca\/","title":"Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology - McGill Law Journal","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jtE8ui1GwW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/article\/common-law-constitutionalism-through-methodology\/\">Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/fr\/article\/common-law-constitutionalism-through-methodology\/embed\/#?secret=jtE8ui1GwW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Common Law Constitutionalism Through Methodology\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; McGill Law Journal\" data-secret=\"jtE8ui1GwW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/mcgill-lawjournal-new.nixa.ca\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","description":"Introduction Methods are a cornerstone of the advance of common law constitutionalism, both within jurisdictions and in the transnational sphere. Common law methods, including interpretive presumptions and reasoning by unwritten or implied principles, are central to an appreciation of the development of common law constitutionalist thought. Common law constitutionalism has attracted renewed attention as a &hellip; Continued"}